Indicate number of shares or other units outstanding of each of registrant’s classes of capital or common stock or other ownership interests, if and as stated on cover of related periodic report. Where multiple classes or units exist define each class/interest by adding class of stock items such as Common Class A , Common Class B or Partnership Interest onto the Instrument of the Entity Listings, Instrument. There is no evidence that FMC was represented at the 1954 meeting at the St. Clair Inn.


That portion of the plaintiff’s case rested solely upon the testimony of Arthur F. Smith and inferences drawn therefrom, together with the acknowledged uniformity of the list prices of the chlor-alkali products by all producers and the contemporaneous announcements of the price increases by all of the competitors. The next change in list prices occurred on August 28, 1956, when Columbia-Southern announced a $2.00 per ton Eastern list price increase on chlorine, raising its list price to $63.00 per ton, single unit tank cars, F.O.B. plant, to be effective for contract sales on October 1, 1956, and effective for spot sales immediately. On the same date, and with the same effective dates for contract and spot sales, Columbia-Southern also announced an increase in Eastern list price to $81.00 per ton, F.O.B. plant for chlorine shipped in multiple unit tank cars in lots of 75 tons or more. All of the merchant producers who were selling chlorine in single or multiple unit tank cars later increased their respective Eastern list prices by the same amounts as Columbia-Southern, effective for contract sales on October 1, 1956, and effective for spot sales on, variously, the dates of the respective announcements, the effective date for contract sales, or some dates between those dates. With respect to several of the price increases involvedthe general price increases of 1955 and 1956; the dry caustic increase of 1958, and the chlorine price increase of 1960there was simply a lack of sufficient credible evidence to support a finding that FMC and its competitors conspired to increase chlor-alkali prices “jointly, concurrently and in unison” (Complaint, ¶ 23.).

program in lower Manhattan Beginners and students with intermediate level

EIP that do not meet the capitalization criteria in number 1 above are expensed. Under the plain meaning of subsection , “offensive physical contact” encompassed the conduct of defendant knocking off police officer’s hat–offensive contact that, while separate and apart from the various forms of actual bodily touching, nevertheless involved contact with an item physically appurtenant to the body. Where defendant came up behind victim unexpectedly and threatened victim, screamed a 10-minute tirade at victim, and were actions taken without significant provocation or cognizable justification, facts sufficient to enable a reasonable person to conclude defendant violated subsection . Record did not support a finding that defendant either insulted, taunted, or challenged dog owner, or that defendant did so in a manner likely to provoke a violent response.

Conviction reversed where 1106 3 Plant Assets merely drove his automobile along narrow street in opposite direction from automobile of former girlfriend and did not insult, taunt, or challenge. Where defendants argued that plaintiff was prohibited from possessing firearms under federal law because of the federal Lautenberg Amendment, which prohibits firearm ownership by any person who “has been convicted in any court of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence”, plaintiff’s convictions for harassment did not qualify as a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence under federal law. Act 136, Session Laws 1973, deleted former subsection from this section.

Written Assignment Unit 4.docx

There is no evidence that Oskin made similar inquiries to others in the industry. Oskin’s reason for seeking this information was to assist him in reaching a decision on how much, if anything, FMC should contribute to the Tyrex Association. FMC finally gave $1,000 or $1,500 to the Association while Diamond, McConnell having told Oskin that they would give $1,000, eventually gave $25,000. In April of 1958, because of FMC’s perceived vacillation on the question of granting a discount, Braun and another P&G purchasing agent called on FMC in New York and were told by Gilbert that FMC had not decided whether it would give P&G any discount. This statement by Gilbert was the first indication to P&G that FMC management did not fully support the proposals previously made by Smith. The P&G officials expressed the view that dealing with a bona fide representative of a company should be the same as dealing with the company itself, and criticized FMC’s apparent undue concern over possible reaction by its competitors to a discount. Within a month prior to announcing the dry caustic price increase on March 12, 1958, Smith discussed the proposed $10 a ton increase with, and received the required approval of, his immediate superior, Fred Gilbert, the then General Manager of the Chlor-Alkali Division.

Deixe um comentário

O seu endereço de e-mail não será publicado. Campos obrigatórios são marcados com *